Abstracts

RETURN TO ABSTRACT LISTING


E2165. Culture Positivity Rate for Bone Biopsy of the Foot
Authors
  1. Zachary Beswick; Henry Ford Health System
  2. Beatrice Knisely; Henry Ford Health System
  3. Rachel Cho; Henry Ford Health System
  4. Parth Patel; Henry Ford Health System
  5. Gary Tran; Henry Ford Health System
  6. Joseph Craig; Henry Ford Health System
  7. Chad Klochko; Henry Ford Health System
Objective:
Our institution performs fluoroscopic-guided bone biopsies of the foot in patients suspected of osteomyelitis. The purpose of this study was to determine the culture positivity rate from 242 consecutive bone biopsies of the foot, and to determine how this affected clinical management.

Materials and Methods:
We reviewed the electronic medical record of data from bone biopsies for infection of the foot in 242 patients. 176 patients (73.0%) were diabetic patients; 65 (27%) were nondiabetic patients; and in one patient, we did not have diabetic status information. The patients’ ages ranged from 15.0 -93.0 years with mean age of 58.27 years. All patients had radiographic or MR findings suggestive or diagnostic of osteomyelitis. The biopsies were performed under fluoroscopic guidance from one or more passes of a 17-gauge Ostycut needle (Becton, Dickinson and Company 1 Becton Drive Franklin Lakes, NJ) into the clinically and radiologically area of suspicion for infection. More than one pass was performed if the first pass yielded an inadequate bone core.

Results:
Overall positive rate of growth of bacteria was 24.4%. There was a broad spectrum of bacterial growth in the positive cases including S Aureus, S epidermidis, Group B Strep, Alpha hemolytic Strep, Enterobacter Cloace, E coli, Bacteroides, and Pseudomonas, amongst others. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of growth between diabetic and nondiabetic patients (25.6% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.519). There was no significant difference in the rate of growth between those patients who had been on antibiotics and those who had not been on antibiotics (22.7% vs 27.3%, p 0.428). In patients who had been on antibiotics, there was an average time of 4.18 days cessation before biopsy. In patients whose cultures had bacterial growth, 70% had a change of antibiotic treatment (17% of the total patients). In all patients with no growth of bacteria there was no change in antibiotics.

Conclusion:
The rate of bacterial growth (25.6% in diabetic patients and 21.5% in nondiabetic patients) was higher than we expected. 70% of patients whose cultures had bacterial growth had their antibiotics changed to target those bacteria more specifically. There was no statistical difference in bacterial growth between diabetic and nondiabetic patients. There was no significant difference in the rate of bacterial growth between the patients who had been on antibiotics vs those who had not.